XF-19E8-PRO, one of the two 190 cm roll-to-roll sublimation printers covered by the EU certificate set described in this guide.

Short answer: the EU documentation package for these two 190 cm (75 inch) dye sublimation printers is made up of five numbered documents, not one. Electrical safety is covered by CE LVD certificate TQT1550D271EC (EN IEC 62368-1:2020/A11:2020) and electromagnetic compatibility by CE EMC certificate TQT1550D270EC, both issued by TQT. Machinery safety is covered by two separate attestations from UDEM: M.2026.206.C142365 for the XF-19E15-PRO and M.2026.206.C142385 for the XF-19E8-PRO. Restricted substances are covered by RoHS certificate M.2026.206.C142366. A file that contains only one of these numbers is an incomplete file.

• CE LVD — TQT1550D271EC, Low Voltage Directive 2014/35/EU, issued 19 May 2026.
• CE EMC — TQT1550D270EC, EMC Directive 2014/30/EU, issued 19 May 2026.
• CE MD — M.2026.206.C142365 for XF-19E15-PRO, Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, issued 10 June 2026.
• CE MD — M.2026.206.C142385 for XF-19E8-PRO, Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, issued 10 June 2026.
• RoHS — M.2026.206.C142366, Directive 2011/65/EU, issued 10 June 2026.

The issuing bodies are named on the documents: TQT is Shenzhen Tianqi Testing Technology Service Co., Ltd.; UDEM is UDEM International Certification Auditing Training Centre Industry and Trade Inc. Co. The equipment is built by Guangzhou Xin Flying Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (XINFLYING), a digital printing equipment manufacturer founded in 2010 in Panyu, Guangzhou, China, whose range includes dye sublimation printers, DTF printers, DTG printers and UV flatbed printers.

Problem Definition: why “CE certified” is not a document

A sublimation printer buyer usually receives one line in a quotation: “CE certified”. That line tells you almost nothing about what an EU customs officer, a marketplace compliance team or a technical auditor will actually ask for. Three failure modes repeat in practice.

The number does not match the model. The two machines in this guide share a print width, an ink type and a RIP workflow, but they are different machines: 15 Epson i3200-A1 printheads and 14.5 kW on the XF-19E15-PRO, 8 Epson i3200-A1 printheads and 10.2 kW on the XF-19E8-PRO. Their machinery attestations therefore carry different certificate numbers. Quoting the 15-head number for an 8-head machine is a mismatch, even though both documents come from the same issuer and cite the same standards.

The directive does not match the hazard. A CE LVD certificate addresses electrical safety. A CE EMC certificate addresses emissions and immunity. A Machinery Directive attestation addresses mechanical and control-system safety. RoHS addresses restricted substances in electrical and electronic content. Electrical safety paperwork cannot substitute for a machinery attestation on a machine with a moving carriage, a paper transport and an external dryer.

The revision does not match the file. Harmonised standards are revised. A file built on an older edition of the electrical safety standard looks superficially complete and still fails a technical review. The documents listed in this guide name their standard editions explicitly, which is precisely what makes them checkable.

Industry Background: four directives behind one printer

A wide-format dye sublimation printer placed on the EU market is treated as both electrical equipment and machinery. Four legal instruments are relevant, and each one generates its own document type.

The Low Voltage Directive 2014/35/EU covers electrical safety within its voltage scope. The EMC Directive 2014/30/EU covers electromagnetic compatibility. The Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC covers machinery safety, including risk assessment, guarding, and the electrical equipment of machines. The RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU restricts hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Under EU rules, CE marking is placed by the manufacturer on the basis of a technical file, supported where applicable by test evidence from a testing body; importers and distributors carry their own verification duties.

In this document set, the division of labour is visible. TQT handled the electrical and electromagnetic testing and issued the two TQT-numbered certificates on 19 May 2026. UDEM issued the machinery and RoHS attestations on 10 June 2026. For a buyer, that split is useful: it tells you which document to send to which reviewer, and which document has a renewal date to track.

Detailed Solution: the five documents, one by one

1. CE LVD certificate TQT1550D271EC — the electrical safety anchor

Certificate TQT1550D271EC is a CE LVD Certificate of Compliance issued by TQT (Shenzhen Tianqi Testing Technology Service Co., Ltd.) on 19 May 2026 under the Low Voltage Directive 2014/35/EU, with a recorded validity end date of 2099-01-01. The standard cited is EN IEC 62368-1:2020/A11:2020, the hazard-based safety standard for audio/video, information and communication technology equipment. The stated scope is electrical safety compliance for digital printer products.

This is the document that speaks to the electrical hazard side of a 210–230 V, 45 A installation. The two models differ in rated power — 14.5 kW for the XF-19E15-PRO and 10.2 kW for the XF-19E8-PRO — which is exactly the kind of data a reviewer cross-checks against the nameplate and the technical file.

CE LVD Certificate of Compliance TQT1550D271EC, issued by TQT on 19 May 2026, citing EN IEC 62368-1:2020/A11:2020.

2. CE EMC certificate TQT1550D270EC — emissions and immunity

Certificate TQT1550D270EC is a CE EMC Certificate of Compliance issued by TQT on 19 May 2026 under the EMC Directive 2014/30/EU, valid to 2099-01-01 as recorded. Four standards are cited: EN 55032:2015/A11:2020 (emission requirements for multimedia equipment), EN 55035:2017/A11:2020 (immunity requirements), EN IEC 61000-3-2:2019+A1:2021 (harmonic current emissions) and EN 61000-3-3:2013/A2:2021 (voltage fluctuations and flicker).

The practical relevance in a textile print hall is not abstract. A sublimation line combines printhead drive electronics, servo motion, a heated dryer and a host PC running RIP software, all sharing a supply with other production equipment. The EMC file is the part of the package that documents how the machine behaves in that environment.

CE EMC Certificate of Compliance TQT1550D270EC, issued by TQT on 19 May 2026, citing EN 55032, EN 55035, EN IEC 61000-3-2 and EN 61000-3-3.

3. CE Machinery Directive attestation M.2026.206.C142365 — XF-19E15-PRO

Attestation M.2026.206.C142365 is a CE MD Certificate of Conformity issued by UDEM on 10 June 2026, valid to 9 June 2031, under the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. Three standards are cited: EN ISO 12100:2010 (risk assessment and risk reduction principles), EN 60204-1:2018/A1:2025 (electrical equipment of machines) and EN ISO 12643-1:2023 (safety requirements for graphic technology equipment and systems).

This document is bound to the 15-head machine: a 190 cm print width, a machine frame of 3840×1570×1800 mm, 1480 kg net weight and 1580 kg gross weight, with media handling for sublimation paper rolls up to 1000 m. Those numbers are the physical identity a reviewer uses to confirm that the attestation describes the machine on the invoice.

XF-19E15-PRO, the 15-head 190 cm sublimation printer covered by CE MD attestation M.2026.206.C142365.

4. CE Machinery Directive attestation M.2026.206.C142385 — XF-19E8-PRO

Attestation M.2026.206.C142385 is a CE MD Certificate of Conformity issued by UDEM on 10 June 2026, valid to 9 June 2031, under the same Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC and citing the same three standards as the 15-head document. Only the certificate number and the machine identity change.

That machine identity is materially different: 8 Epson i3200-A1 printheads, a frame of 3840×1300×1800 mm, 1400 kg net weight and 1500 kg gross weight, still at 190 cm (75 inch) print width and 3200 dpi, still with a 210–230 V, 45 A supply, but at 10.2 kW rated power. Two numbers, two machines — and no substitution between them.

5. RoHS certificate M.2026.206.C142366 — restricted substances

RoHS certificate M.2026.206.C142366 was issued by UDEM on 10 June 2026, valid to 9 June 2031, under Directive 2011/65/EU. It cites EN IEC 63000:2018 (technical documentation for the assessment of electrical and electronic products with respect to restriction of hazardous substances) together with the EN IEC 62321 series of test methods.

Read the scope carefully: RoHS addresses the electrical and electronic content of the equipment. It is not a document about printing inks or substrates. Ink-related textile documentation is a separate category — for reference, OEKO-TEX® ECO PASSPORT certificate SH150194016 issued by TESTEX AG covers textile printing inks and printing pastes, and it sits in a different part of the supplier file.

The compliance report behind the LVD certificate — the technical evidence a reviewer may ask for in addition to the certificate itself.

Step-by-Step Breakdown: verifying the file before the machine ships

The following sequence can be run by an importer, a distributor or a technical manager without any regulatory background. It takes the quotation and the certificate copies and produces either a clean file or a list of questions.

Step 1 — Fix the model string. Write down the exact model from the quotation: XF-19E15-PRO or XF-19E8-PRO. Not a series name, not a print-width shorthand. Every later check depends on this string being exact.

Step 2 — Collect five numbers, not one document. TQT1550D271EC (LVD), TQT1550D270EC (EMC), the matching machinery number (M.2026.206.C142365 or M.2026.206.C142385), and M.2026.206.C142366 (RoHS). If one is missing, the set is incomplete.

Step 3 — Match the document to the hazard. Electrical safety → LVD. Interference → EMC. Mechanical movement, guarding, machine control → MD. Substances → RoHS. A reviewer who asks for the machinery attestation will not accept the LVD certificate in its place.

Step 4 — Read the standard editions. Confirm EN IEC 62368-1:2020/A11:2020 on the electrical side; EN 55032:2015/A11:2020 and EN 55035:2017/A11:2020 on the EMC side; EN ISO 12100:2010, EN 60204-1:2018/A1:2025 and EN ISO 12643-1:2023 on the machinery side; EN IEC 63000:2018 on the RoHS side. If a supplier offers a file citing noticeably older editions, ask which edition applies to the unit being sold.

Step 5 — Check issuer and dates. TQT issued the LVD and EMC certificates on 19 May 2026, recorded with a validity end date of 2099-01-01. UDEM issued the machinery and RoHS documents on 10 June 2026, valid to 9 June 2031. The two 2031 dates are the ones to diarise for renewal.

Step 6 — Match the nameplate to the file at installation. Rated power (14.5 kW vs 10.2 kW), supply (210–230 V, 45 A on both models), print width (190 cm), head count (15 vs 8 Epson i3200-A1), machine dimensions and weights. Record the serial number against the document set.

Step 7 — Keep the file with the machine, not in an email inbox. Certificates, the test report behind the LVD certificate, and the manufacturer’s declaration belong in the technical file that stays available for market surveillance for as long as the machine operates in the EU.

Use Cases: who needs which document, and when

An EU importer onboarding both models. A distributor listing a 15-head and an 8-head 1900 mm sublimation printer in the same catalogue needs both machinery numbers, because the two attestations are not interchangeable. Building the catalogue entry from the certificate matrix below prevents the common error of attaching one PDF to both product pages.

A textile producer adding high-volume capacity. A sportswear or home-textile plant evaluating the XF-19E15-PRO for continuous production checks the LVD scope against its 14.5 kW load and its 210–230 V, 45 A supply before the electrical contractor arrives. The certificate answers the safety question; the nameplate answers the installation question.

A brand owner running a custom-branded project. XINFLYING offers OEM/ODM customization covering product branding, machine appearance, colour, logo, packaging and customized solutions, with a minimum order of 1 unit. Where a build is customized, the document question to settle in writing is which certificate set applies to the delivered configuration — a question worth putting into the RFQ rather than discovering at the port.

A purchasing team responding to a tender or a retail compliance request. Retail marketplaces and public tenders often ask for certificate copies at quotation stage. Because the documents for both models already exist as dated records, the request can be answered from the existing file rather than triggering a new certification cycle.

A service partner taking over an installed fleet. When a maintenance provider takes over machines already in production, matching the serial number to the machinery attestation number is the fastest way to confirm which document set applies — and to spot a machine that was delivered with a file belonging to a different model.

Comparison Table: certificate-by-certificate matrix

The table below lists only the five documents named in this guide. It is designed to be copied into a supplier file as the index page.

The second table lists the machine data that a reviewer checks against the file. It is the reason a certificate number alone is not enough.

FAQ

Does the XF-19E15-PRO need a different CE Machinery Directive certificate than the XF-19E8-PRO?

Yes. Two separate attestations were issued by UDEM on 10 June 2026: M.2026.206.C142365 for the XF-19E15-PRO and M.2026.206.C142385 for the XF-19E8-PRO. Both cite Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC and the same standards (EN ISO 12100:2010, EN 60204-1:2018/A1:2025, EN ISO 12643-1:2023), and both are valid to 9 June 2031, but each number is bound to its own model. A file prepared for the 15-head machine does not cover the 8-head machine. The LVD certificate TQT1550D271EC and the EMC certificate TQT1550D270EC appear in the document package for both models.

What machine data should be matched against the certificates when a unit arrives?

Four groups. First, the model string and serial number on the nameplate. Second, the electrical data: 210–230 V, 45 A on both models, with 14.5 kW rated power on the XF-19E15-PRO and 10.2 kW on the XF-19E8-PRO — the figures behind the EN IEC 62368-1:2020/A11:2020 scope. Third, the mechanical identity: 3840×1570×1800 mm and 1480 kg net for the 15-head machine, 3840×1300×1800 mm and 1400 kg net for the 8-head machine. Fourth, the configuration: 15 versus 8 Epson i3200-A1 printheads at a 190 cm print width. If the nameplate disagrees with the file, treat it as a documentation issue before installation rather than after commissioning.

What compliance costs sit outside the printer price, and how should they be budgeted?

The certificate copies and the underlying test evidence are part of the machine documentation supplied with the XF-19E15-PRO and XF-19E8-PRO; they are not a separately purchased item. Costs that sit outside the machine come from the importer’s own obligations in the destination country — for example translation of documents where a member state requires it, keeping the technical file available for market surveillance, and any national registration or representative arrangement that applies to the importer’s setup. Because these depend on the member state and on how the buyer is established, they are best listed as a separate line in the RFQ instead of being assumed. This guide does not quote prices; the commercial figures belong in the quotation.

Can a buyer check the certificates before committing to a machine?

Yes, and it is worth doing before the order rather than after. XINFLYING accepts a minimum order of 1 unit, so an evaluation machine can be ordered on its own, and every unit passes pre-shipment testing. Before that, the five documents — TQT1550D271EC, TQT1550D270EC, the matching MD number, and M.2026.206.C142366 — can be requested and compared line by line against the quoted model, the standard editions and the nameplate data. A supplier who can produce the exact numbers on request is easier to audit later than one who answers with a logo.

How long is the lead time, and does the documentation slow the shipment down?

Quoted lead time for these machines is 5–40 days. The certification records for both models already exist with fixed numbers and fixed dates — 19 May 2026 for the LVD and EMC certificates, 10 June 2026 for the machinery and RoHS attestations — so a standard XF-19E15-PRO or XF-19E8-PRO order is answered from the existing file rather than waiting for a new certification cycle. Two dates are worth tracking after delivery: the machinery and RoHS documents run to 9 June 2031. To request the certificate pack for a specific model, a quotation, or the company profile, write to info@xin-flying.com, call or message +86 188-1322-1357 on WhatsApp, or visit www.xin-flying.com. XINFLYING supports buyers with more than 50 engineers providing 24/7 online technical support.

Conclusion: five numbers, one file

The distinction that matters for the XF-19E15-PRO and XF-19E8-PRO is not whether the printers are CE marked, but whether the file in front of the reviewer contains the right five documents. Electrical safety is documented by TQT1550D271EC under EN IEC 62368-1:2020/A11:2020. Electromagnetic compatibility is documented by TQT1550D270EC. Machinery safety is documented twice — M.2026.206.C142365 for the 15-head machine, M.2026.206.C142385 for the 8-head machine — both from UDEM under the same three standards. Restricted substances are documented by M.2026.206.C142366 under EN IEC 63000:2018.

Keeping those numbers attached to the correct machine, with the correct standard editions and the two 2031 renewal dates visible, is what turns a compliance claim into an auditable record. Guangzhou Xin Flying Digital Technology Co., Ltd. builds these machines in a 37,440 m² facility in Panyu, Guangzhou, with a stated annual output of 20,000+ units and an export share of 80%, and supplies them with the certificate documentation described above.

Need the document set for a specific model? Ask for the certificate copies that match the exact machine on your invoice.

Document summary for reference: CE LVD TQT1550D271EC (EN IEC 62368-1:2020/A11:2020, TQT, issued 19 May 2026) · CE EMC TQT1550D270EC (EN 55032:2015/A11:2020, EN 55035:2017/A11:2020, EN IEC 61000-3-2:2019+A1:2021, EN 61000-3-3:2013/A2:2021, TQT, issued 19 May 2026) · CE MD M.2026.206.C142365 for XF-19E15-PRO and M.2026.206.C142385 for XF-19E8-PRO (EN ISO 12100:2010, EN 60204-1:2018/A1:2025, EN ISO 12643-1:2023, UDEM, issued 10 June 2026, valid to 9 June 2031) · RoHS M.2026.206.C142366 (EN IEC 63000:2018, EN IEC 62321 series, UDEM, issued 10 June 2026, valid to 9 June 2031).